FMLA leave can include travel time
December 18, 2024
Eligible employees are entitled to take leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) for qualifying reasons. Those reasons include their own or a family member’s serious health condition. Sometimes, situations related to those conditions involve travel. An employee might, for example, need to take a family member to a specialist in a particular city for treatment.
While most leave administrators are aware that any time off for the treatment would qualify for FMLA protections. Some might not be aware that the time it takes to travel to treatment would also likely qualify for FMLA protections.
Unfortunately, neither the FMLA statute nor regulations specifically address travel. The U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division has not produced any guidance on this. Even case law is sparse on it. The currently available material simply does not talk about whether the FMLA protects travel in such a situation.
Needed travel
For guidance, perhaps we turn to simple logic. For example, if an employee needs to travel to obtain treatment/care, it would be logical for employers to consider the travel as part of the treatment/care and, therefore, be protected by the FMLA.
In other words, if the employee’s travel is directly related to the treatment or care, employers should likely count it as FMLA leave. If the health care provider can’t give the treatment unless the patient is physically present, the employee must travel to get it.
Compare this to situations where travel (or other activity) is only indirectly related to care. One court case did consider this. An employee missed work to clean his mother’s basement after a flood, as his mother had hepatitis, and the stagnant water was a breeding ground for the disease.
The court ruled that the time off for the cleaning was not FMLA-protected (Lane v. Pontiac Osteopathic Hospital, U.S. District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division, 09-12634, 6/21/2010). The employee wasn’t even near his mother while he was cleaning, so he wasn’t directly caring for her.
Employees should be able to show that travel is (or was) required to get the treatment/care and that the employee remained near the family member. If employees cannot show this, employers could have a better argument denying the FMLA protections for the time spent traveling.
With the growth in telehealth, this issue may become less of an issue. Patients must receive many forms of treatment in person.
The regulations offer another bit of guidance, as FMLA leave for adoption includes traveling to another country to complete the adoption.
Therefore, the safest route in such situations would be for employers to include the travel time needed to obtain treatment as FMLA leave. If employers would like to deny the FMLA protections for travel time, they might end up being among the first to spend time and other resources to have this question specifically answered by the courts.
Key to remember: If the travel is so intertwined with the need to obtain treatment for an employee’s or a family member’s treatment, it would likely be FMLA leave.
December 18, 2024
AuthorDarlene Clabault
TypeIndustry News
Industries{not populated}
Related TopicsFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Governing BodiesWage and Hour Division (WHD), DOL
Citations{not populated}